Goto

Collaborating Authors

 neural architecture search



UnsupervisedGraphNeuralArchitectureSearch withDisentangledSelf-supervision

Neural Information Processing Systems

The existing graph neural architecture search (GNAS) methods heavily rely on supervised labels during the search process, failing to handle ubiquitous scenarios where supervisions are not available. In this paper, we study the problem of unsupervised graph neural architecture search, which remains unexplored inthe literature. The key problem is to discover the latent graph factors that drive the formation of graph data as well as the underlying relations between the factors andtheoptimal neural architectures.




Supplementary Materials for NAR-Former V2: Rethinking Transformer for Universal Neural Network Representation Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Right: Normalized attention scores processed by two different normalization methods. Table 1: Performance of searched architectures using different NAS algorithms in DARTS [ 7 ] space on CIFAR-10 [ 5 ]. The inference latency was measured on a machine with GeForce RTX 3090 GPU. The batch size was set to 1. Encode(ms) Infer(ms) Total(ms) NAR-Former 2.4784 17.4864 19.9648 NAR-Former V2 2.3722 5.2276 7.5998 may be somewhat different. Due to the softmax, Eq. ( 5) focuses almost all attention on the current The Eq. ( 2) restricts attention to connected nodes by introducing the adjacency matrix.





A Related Work Neural Architecture Search (NAS) was introduced to ease the process of manually designing complex

Neural Information Processing Systems

However, existing MP-NAS methods face architectural limitations. These limitations hinder MP-NAS usage in SOT A search spaces, leaving the challenge of swiftly designing effective large models unresolved. Accuracy is the result of the network training on ImageNet for 200 epochs. An accuracy prediction model that operates without FLOPs information. Table 2 illustrates the outcomes of these models.